Jesus

Getting an eternal perspective on annoying people helped some, but it didn’t solve the problem. For the last few days, I’ve been having fantasies of telling this person–let’s call him Alan–of telling Alan off: kindly and gently, but still telling him off.

Why? Because my last interaction with him was unpleasant; I saw that arrogance again, and I also saw the insecurity, and I was actually rather surprised, because there was more of the bluster that the insecure use than I had expected. What changed this time is the knowledge that Alan is going on a retreat of sorts for personal introspection and evaluation. He likes to do a mental accounting once a year and settle up, and this settling up does involve making amends for wrongs. I should add here that Alan is very ethical; he is not the stereotypical atheist without a conscience. He has pretty high standards for himself.

But back to me: I immediately thought, “I’d like an apology! How about making some amends towards me!” And within a few hours, as I turned this over in my mind, I came up with the brilliant idea that now would be the ideal time to confront him. He’s headed off to consider his life; wouldn’t I be helping him by giving him something to consider? And to make it less confrontational, I would do it as a letter; slip it under his door on Friday on my way out and avoid any direct contact.

As I’ve turned this over in my mind–obsessed about it, really–I’ve known that A) this isn’t the solution, and B) I’m not helping myself any with such thinking. So last night, as I lay in bed, I prayed (which should have occurred much sooner in this process!). I said, “God, I clearly don’t know what to do here; I need help. What would Jesus do?”

It’s amazing the clarity that comes when we give up on our own ideas, acknowledge our own cluelessness, and give God permission to speak!

Immediately I thought of Jesus and his confrontations. Jesus knew how to put someone in his place. He called the pharisees whitewashed tombs, and he called Peter "Satan." Ouch!

I then I wondered: how many stupid, arrogant things did Jesus not address? How much did He overlook? Peter seems pretty adept at putting his foot in his mouth; he must have given Jesus a lot of opportunities for rebuke.

Then I thought, “The Bible says that Jesus knew people's thoughts; He had a divine understanding of when to speak and when not to.” Here’s the reasoning: Jesus could safely rebuke people, throw out the money changers, call people names because He had a divine sense that we don’t have.

But then I realized: that doesn’t work. How can Jesus be tempted in all things and sympathize with my weakness if He has something I don’t? The reason for Jesus’ people skills can’t be a divine advantage exclusive to Him; if that’s the case, He is no longer the great high priest described in Hebrews.

So I thought: what did Jesus have that I lack? What did Jesus have that I can have too? Immediately I knew. Jesus filtered everything through love. How did Jesus put up with Peter, James, and John (to name just a few)? He loved them.

Love defined and refined Jesus’ motives. Love allowed Jesus to know when to overlook an offense and when to confront. Jesus had a thought process, a filter, that continually said, “I love Peter; I want to bless Peter; what is best for Peter at this moment?”

In contrast, my thinking is more often, “I love Dan; I want to make Dan feel better; what will make Dan feel best at this moment?”

All this went through my head in less time than it has taken you to read it. And I immediately knew: I cannot confront Alan until I love him and the confrontation is motivated by a true desire to bless him rather than make myself feel better. Only then, when I’ve filtered the situation and my responses through love, can I be certain that my actions are the best for both me and Alan.

Next time, I’ll share some of my strategies for developing a love filter. In the meantime, use the comments to tell us how you deal with difficult people.

This entry is part 3 of 6 in the series peace

In my previous posts, I’ve touched on the role of our thinking in regard to peace: the peace of Christ rules in our hearts when we submit our thoughts and feelings to peace (Colossians 3:15), and the peace that passes understanding can guard our hearts and minds when we let go of anxious thinking and submit ourselves to God through prayer and thanksgiving (Philippians 4:6–7). This leads me to Isaiah 26:3:

You keep him in perfect peace
whose mind is stayed on You,
because he trusts in You.

What a beautiful promise!

My first thought in reading this was “What does Isaiah mean by perfect peace?” And, of course, I thought of the hymn I grew up singing, “Peace, Perfect Peace.” read the complete post

personal attention

January 3, 2007

Most of us like personal attention, knowing that someone else has given thought to us individually and specifically. But so many Christians don’t seem to believe that personal attention can occur between themselves and God, and certainly, the lost don’t believe that such a thing exists–and they often make fun of us who not only […]

Read the full article →

Daniel: “God is my judge”

January 2, 2007

I have come to dislike resolutions because they don’t work very well for me–or apparently for most other people, based on what I read in magazines. Instead, I ask myself, “How do I want to grow in this new year? How would I like to be different in 2007?” Because I teach one-semester courses, I view my year as having three beginnings, spring, summer, and fall. And I like that, because it gives me plenty of opportunities to step back and evaluate where I’m headed and how things are going. So, as I enter January, I try to think more about the next few months rather than the entire year, and that makes the task much less daunting.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been reminded that I tend toward criticism. Some of it is personality: I’m detail-oriented, and as I take in the details, I tend to notice the problem areas. That can be a blessing–if you’re in a situation that requires evaluation. But it’s not a blessing when it becomes the normal mode of interaction with life.

I find it easy to focus on the negative, both in myself and in others. This personality trait was magnified by past experiences. Growing up in a religious tradition that constantly evaluated who was in and out of the Kingdom made it easy to live in perpetual judgment. This, coupled with a dominating sense of God as Judge, set me up for some problems.

I think I’ve come a good ways in changing this.

Read the full article →

crying out for mercy

October 26, 2006
This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series mercy

This is second in a series on mercy.

Tuesday, I wrote about praying the Jesus Prayer (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner) and how the beginning acknowledges all that Jesus is. I ended with the question, “But what about the mercy part?” and that’s where I’ll pick up today.

I wondered how often mercy showed up in Scripture. It’s there a lot! What caught my attention as I looked at the gospels is that the most frequent occurrence of mercy is in requests:

Read the full article →

Lord, have mercy

October 24, 2006
This entry is part 1 of 3 in the series mercy

I never gave much thought to the mercy of God until this past weekend. “Lord, have mercy” has long been an expression of exasperation (as in, “Lord have mercy! What were you thinking?”) rather than a prayer. My first exposure to this was in sixth grade, when we moved to Columbus, Mississippi–my family’s first time in the South. My teacher that year–I can’t remember her name, but I clearly remember her face, her blue hair, and her rather unpleasant disposition–was a good Southern woman, and she used to exclaim, “Laaaw-zay mer-say may!” (translation: Lordy, mercy me!) when she was frustrated. Later, in high school, Sunday school teacher Dave Krebs suggested to us boys that “mercy” was a good word to say instead of a profanity. Not a bad idea, I suppose. The other place that I encountered “mercy” was in games of strength: you extend your arms upward, interlock fingers with the other guy, and try to push him down to his knees, making him cry for mercy.

The upshot of this, particularly using mercy as an exclamation, is that the word was emptied of meaning for me. I knew that it was a theologically important concept, as well as a potentially troubling one, linked as it always was to God’s sovereignty. God said to Moses, “I will show mercy on whom I will show mercy,” and I always wondered how He decided. Since I usually ended up scared when I pondered this, I decided not to think about it at all. So “mercy” didn’t enter much into my understanding of God or into my prayers.

Read the full article →

good news! humility is God’s work

September 27, 2006
This entry is part 10 of 10 in the series humility

This is the 10th post in a series on humility.

As I’ve already noted, it’s easy to get caught up in developing humility on my own, out of my strength and determination. And certainly, determination is required–but it’s a determination not to do but to be, to rest, to trust. Andrew Murray makes that clear as he continues his exploration of humility.

In the chapter “Humility and Faith,” he states that pride works against faith and that “faith and humility are at their root one” because both focus on God as all in all. The next step in Murray’s study is to consider humility and death to self. Murray writes, “Humility and death are in their very nature one: humility is the bud; in death the fruit is ripened to perfection.” The obvious question is “how do I let God become all in all? How do I die to self?” I love Murray’s answer, because it takes the pressure off of me:…

Read the full article →