choice

After reading yesterday’s post on praying for our enemies, Not Saussure was kind enough to point me to the blog of Rachel of North London, a woman who survived the terrorist train bombings on July 7, 2005. In her post “The F Word,” Rachel explores the meaning of forgiveness in very real, very practical terms.

As Rachel recounts both her own feelings and those of other victims, the recurring theme is that forgiveness is necessary. She quotes Kristy, who says, “Forgiveness is self-preservation; if I can’t forgive it will destroy me.” Rachel says of herself,

For me forgiveness is about moving through the storm of pain and outrage, holding onto my essential self, which was there before the devastating event. It’s hard to let go of the desire for revenge: anger became my sole driver in the months after the first attack. But to be trapped in a state of permanent rage hurts me. I hold what has happened to me… and I try to live through it. I do not want to live a life defined entirely by an attack on me.

Forgiveness is a choice, and a gift I make to myself, to live freely in the light, rather than to be trapped in a hell of hatred and vengefulness. It has little to do with the perpetrators of the crimes; it is for me, not them that I choose to do this. It is how I stay sane.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu has said that “To forgive is not just to be altruistic. It is the best form of self-interest.” My own experience has taught me this truth: unforgiveness will eat me alive. Clearly, there is a real benefit in forgiveness.

For Christians, the question is not so much “Will I forgive?” as “How do I forgive?” read the complete post

I Saw the Lord : A Wake-Up Call for Your HeartI started reading Anne Graham Lotz’s I Saw the Lord a few days ago. Lotz uses the word revival to describe what she hopes to inspire; I would use the word passion. She makes an interesting point that Isaiah preached before his famed encounter with God in chapter 6, but he became passionate after seeing the Lord on His throne. As a modern counterpart to Isaiah, Lotz offers the story of Carole, whose already good life was transformed by a new vision of God and the resulting new perspective on herself. Carole states,

Revival, for me, isn’t about leaving behind what the world has to offer. It’s about leaving behind sin so that I can embrace the richer life the Lord has to offer.

What a wonderful, life-giving approach! I grew up in a denomination defined by don’t: don’t drink, don’t smoke, don’t dance, don’t do what other churches do, don’t, don’t, don’t. Such a perspective leads to, among other things, a sense of loss, of missing out. It’s all about the negatives. I suspect for many, salvation is about loss: let me leave behind my friends, my fun, my pleasure so I can go to church and be safe–I mean saved.

Certainly, Jesus does call us to leave some things behind, and loss is involved in the life of the disciple. “Take up your cross daily” is about sacrifice. Jesus tells us to not look back, to leave family and houses and fields behind. But what often gets left out of that teaching is what Jesus also says:

“I tell you the truth,” Jesus replied, “no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age…” (Mark 10:29–30)

That’s why Carole’s statement is so refreshing: she flips it around and says “look at what I get!” The don’t approach implies that we’re giving up fun and pleasure. The life-giving approach reminds us that we’re leaving behind sin–the thing that was killing us–and embracing life, the thing we really want.

So, what are you leaving behind?