Short version: worth reading, but don’t give it to kids who believe in Santa.
The True Saint Nicholas: Why He Matters to Christmas is an easy and informative read. Bennett is a masterful storyteller, transforming what could be a dry encyclopedia entry into an engaging tale. The book is divided into three sections of three chapters each: Life of Nicholas, Legends of Nicholas, and Legacy of Nicholas.
In Part One, Bennett takes the sparse historical materials as well as the legends and hagiographies and combines them into an interesting story of Nicholas’ life, filling in cultural and historical details and making clear what’s certain and what’s supposition. I appreciated Bennett’s occasional use of Scripture and focus on Nicholas’ faith and service to God. This is not about a historical figure who happens to matter to Christians; this is about a Christian who happens to matter to history.
Part Two shows the transformation of Nicholas from godly man to saint invoked and capitalized on by virtually every group, from sailors to merchants to women trying to conceive. Part Three moves to the transformation of Nicholas into Santa Claus. Bennett gives some attention to European variants like the Dutch Sinterklaas, but his primary focus is the genesis of the American Santa of “The Night Before Christmas” and Coca-Cola advertising. I found this particularly interesting as I was unaware of the history and didn’t realize how very American Santa is.
The jacket states that in this book, “Most of all, you will discover why this saintly man who has influenced our most beloved holiday throughout the years is evidence of God’s love, and why he does, indeed, matter to Christmas.” Certainly Bennett makes good on the first claim: Nicholas’ life is an inspiring story of a loving God at work in and through a man submitted to His will.
I’m not so sure about the second claim, though. Here’s what Bennett has to say:
But the stories of Saint Nicholas and Santa Claus are arguably true in a more important way. They are morally true. They offer generosity, kindness, justice, and self-sacrifice over avarice, cruelty, injustice, and self-indulgence. They are about the celebration of human closeness and decency, and the caring for others. They are about families at the hearth. In their totality, they are about the raising of sights and efforts toward a better life.
Is Nicholas worth knowing about? Absolutely. And Bennett shows that Santa and a faith-oriented Christmas are not incompatible. But for me, this final statement about the truth that can be found in Santa is a bit of a stretch. Does that make the book less worthwhile? No. It was definitely worth reading, and I would recommend it.
On a side note, The True Saint Nicholas is a beautifully designed book. For those of us who want our books to be both intellectually engaging and aesthetically pleasing, it delivers. It’s also short: 114 pages of large print, so it reads quickly.
A final note about children: I bought this thinking I would share it with my kids, but the only one that will read it any time soon is the teenager. Our younger two still believe in Santa, and while Bennett doesn’t come out and say that Santa doesn’t exist, the explanation of Santa’s history might burst the bubble for some. I could see reading Part One about the life of Nicholas to my children–the style is very accessible, and they would enjoy the story. But I won’t be passing the book around the family for several years.
Tagged as:
Christmas,
Saint Nicholas,
Santa Claus,
William J. Bennett
Note: I wrote this on Sunday, November 29, but didn’t publish it because I thought it needed something else. Here we are three weeks later, and I’m just now returning to it—and for all the reasons I cite below as my obstacles to observing Advent. Oh well. Reading it now, I find it seems complete and all the more relevant as we enter the final days before Christmas.
Over the past few years, I’ve done fairly well in making some sort of observance of Lent, but Advent has generally escaped me—undoubtedly because the weeks leading up to Christmas are always incredibly busy in ways that the Lenten season never is.
Advent, as those in liturgical churches know, starts on the fourth Sunday before Christmas; Advent Sunday (today), not only starts the Advent season but also marks the beginning of the liturgical year. For much of the Christian world, this day signals changes in prayer, ritual, and family practices leading up to the celebration of Christ’s birth. For the rest of us in low-church settings, Advent passes right on by without so much as a mention, though Christmas will likely get some attention in the December services.
For me, the end of November signals the end of the semester, hurtling full-speed ahead through final classes and final exams toward final grades—and then on to the frenzy of preparing for a Christmas celebration with family. Between the stacks of papers to grade and stacks of gifts to buy and wrap, I have make little time to consider the spiritual significance of the season.
This year, I’m trying to change that; a month ago I decided that, come hell or high water, I would “get” Advent.
Perhaps that’s why today’s reading in God with Us provoked a far deeper response than I would have expected. Richard John Neuhaus reminds us of Matthew 24:37–39, saying,
As in the days of Noah before that great flood, we were lost in eating and drinking, in marrying and giving in marriage. In a word, we were lost in living what we told ourselves was the good life. We wanted more and more of it, and the more we had of it the more we longed for what was beyond the reach of our longing or the grasp of our possessing.
Does that sound just a little bit like Christmas at your house? Or if not your house, your neighborhood and town? Neuhaus continues:
In our longing and our searching, we were blind to the gift already given, Emmanuel: God with us.
Ponder that for a while: the gift already given.
As with so many aspects of life in Christ, the having isn’t in the getting—it’s in the receiving. I was going to “get” Advent, when it’s already here to receive.
Consider the implications; Neuhaus writes:
This season of the Church’s calendar is called Advent, which means “coming.” Christ came, Christ comes, Christ will come again. There is no time—past, present, or future—in which Jesus the Christ is not God with us. He was with you yesterday, is with you today, and will be with you tomorrow.
I feel such comfort, such relief in reading these words, though they tell me nothing I don’t already know–rather, nothing I haven’t already heard. Apparently, I don’t know it, or don’t know it very well, if I find it such a blessing to encounter the truth that Jesus Christ is God with us, with me, all the time.
Thank goodness the Spirit doesn’t treat us as we sometimes treat ourselves! While many of us tend to berate ourselves for failing what we should already know about God, the Spirit simply, gently reminds us of that which we have heard and need to believe more deeply.
As I start Advent, I start with the knowledge that what I’m looking for has already been given; I simply need to receive.
photo credit: Everblooming1
Tagged as:
Advent,
Christmas,
Emmanuel,
God with Us,
Richard John Neuhaus